`
News

Killing an ‘enemy’ is not the answer: SC

sc

The Supreme Court, which ordered on Friday that all encounter deaths in a disturbed area caused by armed forces should be probed, said: “It would not be correct to say that merely because a person was carrying arms in a prohibited area, he or she becomes an enemy or an active member of a banned or unlawful organisation... Before a person can be branded as a militant or a terrorist or an insurgent, there must be the commission or some attempt or semblance of a violent overt act.”

The Bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit said a thorough enquiry should be ordered into “encounter” killings in disturbed areas because the “alleged enemy is a citizen of our country entitled to all fundamental rights including under Article 21 of the Constitution.”

“If members of our armed forces are deployed and employed to kill citizens of our country on the mere allegations or suspicion that they are ‘enemy’ not only the rule of law but our democracy would be in grave danger,” Justice Lokur wrote.

The Supreme Court held that even if the enquiry proved that the victim was an enemy and an “unprovoked aggressor”, the security forces should still answer to the question whether excessive or retaliatory force beyond the call of duty was used.

“Killing an ‘enemy’ is not the only available solution,” Justice Lokur observed.

The court, without making any comment of its own, referred to how the petitioners said that in “most cases the arms are planted on victims.”

To the dual questions as to what and who decides whether “excessive or retaliatory force” was used, the court said that “it is not the encounter or operation which should be under scrutiny but the smoking gun.”

On the question who should conduct the probe into an encounter death to see whether it was of an “indefensible, mala fide and vindictive” nature, the apex court said the enquiry should be done by the Criminal Investigation Department at the instance of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

The court observed that there are several ‘dos and don’ts’ in the defence forces’ rule book and there is no justification whatsoever of breaching these rules of combat and conduct.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The One Stop Destination for Law

A Venture of India of Dreams Foundation

Contact us

Have Something to Share:
Submit Content, Press Releases to info@legaldesire.com
For Media Partner/Adverts Proposals, write to anuj@legaldesire.com

Subscribe to Legal Desire

Copyright © 2016 Legal Desire Media & Publications

To Top

Killing an ‘enemy’ is not th…

by Anuj Kumar time to read: 1 min
0

Get your Daily Dose of Legal Pulse

Subscribe to Legal Desire Daily Email Newsletter

Get Daily Latest Legal News & Notifications about happenings delivered to you via Email in Morning.

Get your Daily Dose of Legal Pulse

Subscribe to Legal Desire Daily Email Newsletter

Get Daily Latest Legal News & Notifications about happenings delivered to you via Email in Morning.

Read previous post:
NEW DELHI, INDIA - MAY 30: Union Women and Child Development Minister Maneka Gandhi releases the Draft Trafficking of Persons (Prevention, Protection and Rehabilitation) Bill 2016 on May 30, 2016 in New Delhi, India. The new bill aims to check human trafficking by unifying several existing laws, meting out tougher punishment for repeat offenders and ensuring the protection and rehabilitation of victims. (Photo by Vipin Kumar/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Bullies Attention: Maneka Gandhi Sets Up Cyber Cell To Check Online Abuses On Women

Furthering her fight against those who troll women on social media, Minister for Women and Child Development, Maneka Gandhi, has...

Close