JNU students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, wanted by Delhi Police in connection with raising of alleged anti-national slogans on the campus, surrendered late Tuesday night. Special Commissioner (Law and Order) Deepak Mishra confirmed the development. Police sources said both students had moved out of the JNU campus and were in their custody.
They were driven out of the campus in a vehicle belonging to the JNU security firm and were met by police officers in two vehicles.
Khalid’s friend Banjyotsna Lahiri confirmed the surrender: “They wanted to put an end to all this and we all wanted it to be a low-key affair. They have been taken into police custody. We don’t know where they will go.”
Three other students wanted by police — Anant Prakash Narayan, Ashutosh Kumar and Rama Naga — said they would not surrender. “We have already given our mobile phone numbers to the police, they have not called us until now. So why should we surrender,” Narayan said.
Earlier in the day, declining to pass any immediate order on their plea for “safe surrender” and indicating that it would take up the matter in detail Wednesday, the Delhi High Court Tuesday suggested that Khalid and Bhattacharya surrender and “follow due procedure”. Justice Pratibha Rani, while declining to pass any order for “interim protection”, mentioned that the trial court would be looking into the matter of police remand, and that a person arrested by police had to produced before the trial court within 24 hours.
Khalid and Bhattacharya had moved petitions seeking permission to surrender before the High Court and “safe passage” from the JNU campus to the court premises, alleging there was “threat to life and limb”. They referred to the attacks last week on journalists and JNU students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar, arrested for sedition, at the Patiala House Courts by lawyers and others. They said they feared they would be attacked if they were taken to the Patiala House Courts, that they were “more vulnerable to unprovoked attacks from a frenzied public than Kanhaiya Kumar”, Justice Pratibha Rani, who refused to allow arguments from lawyers representing Delhi Police and Delhi government, asked the counsel for the JNU students to write down a name and place for their surrender. She also asked the petitioners to indicate which lawyers would accompany them during the surrender process. DCP (South) Prem Nath, who was present in the courtroom, objected to submissions made by the lawyers of the students. The judge then called the DCP and one of the lawyers to her chamber for a closed hearing.
During the hearing, advocate Kamini Jaiswal, who appeared for the JNU students, told the bench that the students had to file a surrender application due to the “exceptional circumstances” that had been created. She pointed out that Kanhaiya Kumar had been beaten up in court while in police custody, and that sting operations shown in the media had indicated that a section of lawyers was “ready to attack” the other students. She argued for “permission for peaceful surrender before the Delhi High Court.” The surrender pleas were taken up by the High Court after 4 pm under heavy police deployment outside. Entry into the courtroom was restricted and only a handful of reporters and lawyers were allowed to enter.
Latest posts by Legal Desire (see all)
- Gujarat HC acquits 14 convicts facing life imprisonment in Sardarpura massacre - October 20, 2016
- SC: Soliciting votes in the name of religion shouldn’t be allowed - October 20, 2016
- Lex Evento-2016 (Moot, Judgement Writing & Research Competition) - October 20, 2016